With this background, the second part will offer a general introduction to a selection of shipborne technologies that can be considered significant developments in the history of naval hand-to-hand combat tactics. The first will consider the question of what characterizes naval hand-to-hand combat and discuss the environmental and cultural factors which influence such practices in general. To this end, the chapter will be divided into two parts. More specifically, this chapter seeks to establish the fact that the practice of naval hand-to-hand combat expresses itself in history conjointly with careful tactical considerations as well as an awareness of the principles that govern the proceedings of seaborne combat. The aim of this chapter is to clarify the general role and nature of hand-to-hand combat practices in European naval warfare before its decline in the early modern period. The evidence suggests that the Virginia experience led to adaptation of traditional military practices and equipment, rendering the 'unfit' arms and armour effective and useful for the context. Recent excavations at James Fort, Jamestown, the site of the colony's initial settlement and its seat of government, have unearthed a wealth of arms and armour that attests the character of early military life at Jamestown. At first glance, this shipment of obsolete arms appears to substantiate the traditional historical view that the English colonists were too ill equipped in both materials and skills to settle Virginia successfully. The gift included calivers, pistols, jacks of plate, brigandines, shirts of mail, and other arms and armour that were deemed 'unfitt for any moderne service' in England. If slash must be used, other weapon such as a dragon scimitar or an abyssal whip would be preferred.SUMMARY: Following a devastating Indian attack in 1622 that killed a quarter of the Virginia colonists, King James I bestowed a 'princely and free guift' of weaponry on the Virginia Company of London for the colony's use. The leaf-bladed sword does have the advantage of being a strong weapon against turoths or kurasks, and having a lower price. The leaf-bladed sword also lacks a special attack (though most players agree the dragon scimitar's special attack is not very useful outside PvP worlds or PvP activities) and requires 55 Slayer to wield. However, the strength bonus of the scimitar is 66 while the sword has only 50 (76% of the scimitar's bonus): at 99 Strength and wielding only the weapons, a leaf-bladed sword can hit 21 while the dragon scimitar can hit 24. With a defender, the leaf-bladed sword is more accurate than the dragon scimitar, does not require the completion of a Master quest ( Monkey Madness I), and only requires 50 Attack to wield. The difference is small, but may be more useful for long-term training. For example, a leaf-bladed sword and dragon defender will have a stab bonus of 92 while the dragon scimitar and dragon defender will have a slash bonus of 91. When coupled with any defender, the leaf-bladed sword will surpass the dragon scimitar in overall stats due to the additional stab bonus granted by the defender. Because the two weapons share the same attack speed and accuracy, the leaf-bladed sword is a more accurate option for killing monsters that are weak against stab attacks, such as chromatic dragons or metal dragons. The leaf-bladed sword's stab bonus of 67 is the same as the dragon scimitar's slash bonus of 67. It has a lower strength bonus than the scimitar just as it is with other metals, but the attack bonuses are identical, making the leaf-bladed sword more useful in certain circumstances than other swords would be. The leaf-bladed sword is considered a good substitute for the dragon sword. For example, rune scimitars are better than rune swords in both accuracy and strength but equal in speed. Scimitars are also considered to be much better than regular swords of the same metal. The dragon scimitar is one of the most popular weapons in RuneScape it is a fast, one-handed weapon with decent strength and accuracy.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |