![]() In practice, that meant it appeared Trump was able to get away with posting things that may have gotten the average Facebook user banned. Both companies have carve-outs from their rules in matters of public interest, and Facebook's CEO has said the company should err on the side of allowing more political speech. That's different from how Facebook - and Twitter for that matter - currently treat politicians and other public figures. The board said the company should generally apply its rules equally, no matter whether the user is the president or an average citizen.īut it acknowledged that people with big audiences, such as politicians or celebrities, can cause outsize harm - and said Facebook should act more quickly when those users break the rules. The board also pushed Facebook to be more transparent about how it treats political leaders and other high-profile accounts in a set of broader recommendations. "We will only get rid of this talk that Facebook is leaning towards certain political opinions when we get to a stage when all decisions on Facebook and Instagram are taken with transparency and clarity and where all users are judged by the same standard," she said.Ĭasting doubt on Facebook's "newsworthiness" policy She said that kind of arbitrary decision, made on the fly, has helped fuel claims that Facebook is biased. They have to stick to their own rules," Thorning-Schmidt said in an interview with Axios. "What we are telling Facebook is that they can't invent penalties as they go along. When it came to Trump, the board said that an indefinite suspension appeared nowhere in its rule book and violates principles of freedom of expression. Politics Why Facebook's Decision On Trump Could Be 'Make Or Break' For His Political Future
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |